I will attempt to show the flaws in it and let the readers know that it takes a lot of thought before becoming a Master or slave. I will list the Bill Of Rights as i have been shown and then go through them one by one and give my thoughts on them. I will then hope to construct a Bill Of Rights that would be in agreement with Masters and slaves. In addition I will try to also come up with a Bill Of Rights for a Master. After all a Master has the right to certain expectations as much as a slave. The purpose of a Bill Of Rights for both the Master and slave is to protect each from maleficence and use and abuse. There are many unscrupulous slaves and Masters out there and one should be aware of that.
Here is the Boy Bill Of rights as i have found them to be.
Boy Bill Of Rights
1.Every boy has the right to have his body, intellect, and emotions protected by his Dom.
2. The boy has the right to choose who he serves and stop serving without being subjected to physical, mental, or emotional abuse.
3.Every Boy has a right to be cared for, disciplined appropriately, and allowed to feel pride in his submission.
4. Every boy has the right to protected sex.
5. Every Boy has the right to privacy
6.Every boy has the right to defend himself from physical, emotional and sexual abuse.
7. Every boy has the right to consent or not consent to sexual activities.
8. Every boy has the right to seek refuge, counsel, and advice from other Dom/subs without expectation of sex, Money, or other services in return.
9. Every boy has the right to a physical and emotional set of friends.
10. Every boy has the right to protect his own possessions and finances against intercession, theft, and non-consensual acquisition.
As you can see, this B.O.R. is worded vaguely and with allot of room for interpretation. This makes it an unrealistic set of rights. There is also no Master Bill Of Rights that I am aware of.
Now lets look at these rights individually.
Right 1 is good but doesn't go into it in detail as it should. The boy has that right of protection for submission and obedience to the Master. It isn' automatically given but is earned. It also isn't something that is in place until a Master and slave have entered into the verbal agreement or contract that establishes the basis for the relationship. It is a starting point that changes as the love and bond between the two grows.
Right 2 is true but only to a certain extent. A slave can't just up and leave with fulfilling his verbal or contractual obligation. This goes to the character, honor, and respectability of the slave as such. If a slave promises to serve for a year verbally or in a contract, then he is obligated to honor that contract. If he terminates the service early, he should have to figure his average monthly expense to the Master and pay off the remainder of his agreement. This is not to indicate that the Master is money hungry, but rather that it recognizes the Master has put in time, money, emotions, expense, and effort into training and making the slave what he is. It should be an honor to pay off the agreement because it shows that the slave is an respected and honorable Man and should be given that respect.
Right 3 is not in depth enough to stand as it is. The sub has those rights, but only for the cost of his love, devotion, submission, and obedience to the Dom. I personally would want a Dom that would let me to continue to work out so that he would be proud of me physically as well as for the service given. The only way that it can happen is for this exchange to take place. A sub/slave should know that part of that right is based on being able to contribute to his upkeep and expense. Only in a 24/7 situation where the Master/Dom is financially able to have a slave that doesn't work would it only constitute the obedience, devotion, love, and submission to the Dom. Then there is more responsibility on the part of the Dom. A slave can never be a mooch!
Right 4 is something that should be discussed prior to entering in the relationship. Protected sex can mean different things in different situation. If a Dom and sub are both neg. for STDsthen having bare back sex should be discussed. When it comes to the Dom sharing is slave property then there is a whole different set of indications. To some, that means the Dom would require the borrowing Dom to use condoms and make sure they were used on anyone engaging in sex with the property. Unless a Master/dom has recent testing and documentation of the other Dom and anyone who uses his property, then it should be noted that a boy has the right not to be infected with any STD. Especially one that can kill him. and the boy should have the right to go after the borrowing Dom civilly if the legal action is appropriate. In some states not telling a person of their HIV status or lying about it is a criminal and civil offense.
Right 5 is uncondusiveto developing the trust and bond necessary for a Dom/sub relationship to work. I think a boy has a right toprivacy when cleaning himself or taking care of daily needs that are a part of life. However this right doesn't allow for a relationship of trust to develop. maybe in the future a slave will be given more privacy by his Dom but that is up to the Dom to decide. in this day and age of computer technology, I wouldn't object to a Master/Dom having a program installed on the computer the slave uses to track where and what he is doing on the computer. After all, it goes to the safety of both the Dom and the sub. think about it. If a sub goes off to meet another Dom and his Dom doesn't know about it and the slave is killed or disfigured, things can get ugly for the Dom that everyone knows the sub is with. That of course depends on how the Dom/sub relationship is perceived by the real world. The Dom can't protect himself from STDs or any other problem that may arise with out knowing everything about his slave and property and what they are doing.
Right 6 is pretty much self explanatory but needs to define it further. In a Dom/sub relationship there is going to be pain and punishment and discipline. That kind of "abuse" should be expected by any sub that enters into a Dom/sub relationship. It is a part of training to be the slave that the sub wants to be and achieve. But the boy should also have the right not to be disfigured, permanently damaged or scared. This is a right, I think to protect against situations like being cut so deep that muscles or tendons are severed and the loss of use of a limb is involved. Or perhaps, but fire to a slave and disfiguring him. I am talking about malice involved in the act of using a sub. I personally would not object to being tattooed to show ownership and if a slave agrees to it, branding.
Right 7 is a bit tricky. I mean a sub should know that he is expected to have sexual relations with his Dom. It is those sexual relationships that help build a bond and cement the relationship and trust. I do think however, that when a slave is shared it should be discussed prior to the event. It goes to the protection of both the slave and the Dom. It is also something that should be discussed before entering into the relations to begin with. I personally feel that I don't have the right to dictate to a Dom whether or not I have sex with him. It should be there for the taking or pleasure of the Dom. After all, denying sex to a Dom is denying your purpose in being a slave as far as I'm concerned.
Right 8 pretty much means that a sub has the right to get advice from anyone. The refuge part would be when an OG Master sees a sub being abused-go back to the definition- and will harbor a slave an protect him while they get their self together to move on in life. Let's face it there are quite a few" Masters/Doms" that only want to hurt someone for the sake of hurting and not for what a Dom/sub relationship is supposed to be about. It is then that a slave should be able to protect themselves by asking another Dom for refuge if the other Dom sees that it would be appropriate and is given to the slave/sub.
Right 9 is vague at the very least and requires some clarification. If you mean the physical right to be in contact with fellow slaves, Doms, and family, then yes that is a right of a boy. He should never become so isolated-after training- that he can't call family or friends just to talk or find out what is going on. That is provided the sub is still in contact with his family and hasn't chosen to close all ties with them. But a boy does not have the right to have sex with anyone he chooses, whenever he wants or have f**kbuddies outside the relationship. If a slave is part of a multi sub household then sexual contact will be dictated by the Dom.
Right 10 is more about financial protection than anything else i believe. I see nothing wrong with a Dom having control over a subs finances. It is the way that control is administered should be discussed before the relationship begins. There are as i said unscrupulous Doms-as as slaves-out there that will try to steal from a slave or Dom. I can see where there might be accounts with both the slave and Doms name on the account. just make sure that they are set up with the slave and/or Dom signature on it. That way should anything happen to either on , the surviving member has access to the money to take care of expenses and such. If the only use of "and" and not "and/or" then the money can be tied up for months or years until the estate is settled. This is the situation where I can see some protection is needed for both parties involved. If it is a 24/7 situation where the sub doesn't work or contribute to his social security or retirement fund then arrangements must be made for the event of death etc.... so that the sub can take care of the Dom if he is disabled or funeral or be able to move on with his life should the unlikely happen. This is the only reason I can see for this right to exist and given.
I have intentionally stated "as Given" or "Given to" in the discussion for a reason. Basically there are two things that can be said about a slave/boys "Rights". A boy ONLY HAS THE RIGHTS/Responsibility that are GIVEN to him by his Dom and that are thoroughly discussed and agreed upon in all areas-physically, emotionally, and financially- BEFORE EVER ENTERING into the relationship to begin with.
By the same Token a Master/Dom ONLY HAS the RIGHTS/Responsibility of submission Given to him in all areas-physically, emotionally, and financially-that have been thoroughly discussed and agreed upon BEFORE taking possession of a sub.
Any Dom/sub that only gives certain areas of responsibility to the other shows a lack of character and an understanding of what it means to be a true Dom/sub as far as i am concerned.
Responsibly can be made to mean obligation. That is why the Dom/sub relationship dynamic is a special one. It is far more about being in a mutual symbiotic relationship then the outside world realizes.
That being said, if anyone has any comments or are a Master looking for a slave feel free to contact me at Raven15@consolidated.net. Always a pleasure hearing from you.
No comments:
Post a Comment